Tag Archives: networking

The 1-Mile WiFi Camera – Almost!

Leave a reply
1-Mile Camera
1-Mile Camera, from Kickstarter campaign.

If you haven’t seen the ads, here’s a link to the new Kickstarter for the “1-Mile WiFi Camera.”

TL;DR: this is a really cool idea, and I like it. However, these cameras won’t work with “normal” WiFi like AyrMesh; they use a special form of WiFi called “WiFi HaLow” (802.11ah), which requires a separate access point. They also sell an access point, but it’s an indoor-only unit that cannot be mounted outdoors, and I’m not entirely sure the effective range of the cameras will be longer than a good WiFi camera with an external antenna and one or more AyrMesh Hubs. I think they’re significantly over-stating the capabilities of the system – it might reach a mile under optimal conditions, but probably not in most conditions. All that said, I still think it’s really cool, and I’ll be excited to hear from folks who use it.

Long-Winded Explanation

I was really excited to see this, because I have been trying to get camera vendors to build long-distance WiFi cameras: battery-operated cameras with solar panels and large, external antennas to extend the range of the cameras to the WiFi access point (like an AyrMesh Hub). The only ones I know of are the Reolink Argus Eco line of cameras. Although they come with relatively small, low-gain antennas, some of the models have RP-SMA antenna connectors that can accept a higher-gain antenna (which you’d have to buy separately – something like this or even this) to maximize their range.

The “1-mile WiFi Camera” does use batteries, a solar panel, and a nice, big, external antenna, which was exciting for me to see. However, closer inspection reveals that it uses WiFi, but only a special and seldom-used form of WiFi called “WiFi HaLow.” This special kind of WiFi has been around for several years, but it is seldom used because it operated on the 900 MHz. band, so very few devices are equipped to connect to it.

Using 900 MHz. is a good idea – it has historically been significantly less congested than the “normal” 2.4 GHz. (2400 MHz.) WiFi band. Because it uses a significantly lower frequency, it is also significantly less affected by obstructions like trees, bushes, and even non-metallic walls. Make no mistake: it’s still at the low end of the “microwave” spectrum, so the signal is still weakened by those obstructions, but not as much as 2.4 GHz. WiFi (and much, much less than 5.8 GHz. or 6 GHz. WiFi, which are not that useful for outdoor WiFi).

I had hoped that 802.11ah might be included in the 802.11ax specification, also known as “WiFi 6,” but it wasn’t. I then hoped it might be included in the 802.11be specification, known as “WiFi 7,” but that didn’t happen, either, so 802.11ah “WiFi HaLow” remains a separate and distinct form of WiFi with very few supported devices.

Because of this, the folks behind the “1-Mile Camera” also sell a WiFi HaLow access point to provide the signal for the camera’s use. This access point is just like the AyrMesh Gateway Hub – it needs to be connected to your router and positioned as high as possible for maximum range. However, it is an indoor device, so you want to get it up on an upper floor or in the attic for maximum range. It’s disappointing that they don’t offer an outdoor access point, because, like the AyrMesh Hubs, that would be more effective.

I should mention that outdoor HaLow access points do exist; Rokland carries an Alfa access point that should work well with these cameras.

One other little fly in the ointment is that, while I mentioned earlier that the 900 MHz. band has historically been less congested, that is changing quickly with the widespread use of LoRa. LoRaWAN has become popular for long-distance, low-bandwidth connections using the same 900 MHz. band, and new “modes” for LoRa like Meshcore and Meshtastic are increasingly popular. All of these add noise to the 900 MHz. band, making it harder for the wide-banded HaLow to work well. The 900 MHz. band is only 26 MHz. wide, and HaLow channels are 16 MHz. wide, so there isn’t even room for two non-overlapping channels. However, HaLow can use OFDM, meaning it divides that 16 MHz. channel into 1-MHz. wide sub-channels, so it can be pretty nimble about “stepping around” interference. However, having to ignore some of those sub-channels reduces the bandwidth (speed) of the HaLow connection, and bandwidth matters much more for cameras.

Conclusion: Maybe Over-Hyped, but Still Interesting

So, to be clear, I think the “1-Mile Camera” claims are a bit overblown. I do think you could use a camera a mile away in perfect conditions: the access point in a high window in a multi-story building, looking out over a very flat area with no (or very few) obstructions and very little interference, and the camera also mounted quite high in the air. In normal operation, I’d expect quite a bit less… BUT I still think that’s pretty cool! I’m eager to hear how “real people” (not paid endorsers) find it.

My counter to the “1-mile camera” is pretty simple: meshing WiFi like AyrMesh can be used to extend regular WiFi (the kind “normal” WiFi cameras, your phone, your tablet, and your laptop use) out a mile, or 2, or 5, or more. This provides a lot more flexibility, because a lot more devices can use the network. It requires more setup than the “1-Mile Camera” promises, but I think any real, working solution will require a fair bit of work to extend a signal a long distance with good bandwidth. As much as I want to see HaLow succeed (and I really do!), I think that the 2.4 GHz. AyrMesh solution is much more practical for the forseeable future.

We’ll be interested in hearing what you think about this.

“Survey says…” and so what?

Leave a reply

As you may recall, we did a survey a few weeks back, and we promised to let you know the results of that survey. So, here they are.

There were a total of 45 responses; geographically, they look like this:

Forms response chart. Question title: What region are you located in?. Number of responses: 45 responses.

That seems about right – most Ayrstone users are in the Midwest, with the East, West, and South coming up behind. I had expected the South to be better-represented, but I think we were too close to planting season there. Thank you to the users who provided specific locations – we didn’t ask, but we appreciate the information.

This one turned out to be a bit of a surprise:

Forms response chart. Question title: What is your primary use of your land? . Number of responses: 45 responses.

We had actually expected a majority of users to be raising row crops – it was surprising to see so many folks doing livestock production. This, of course, is why we ask – if we knew all the answers, we wouldn’t have to. Individual write-in responses here were “Do not farm,” “Recreational prop,” “Hoa security,” and “1.”

Forms response chart. Question title: Which of the following private wireless networking technologies are you familiar with? . Number of responses: 45 responses.

OK, this is our survey, and we make WiFi – the surprising part of this is that, apparently, 6.7{6d84e97b9d70a88c7827a68919bdc428927c26a1a62ff29e804188d6763d834c} of the folks are not aware of WiFi. That’s… interesting. We really did want to see how aware of other Wireless Farm Networking technologies people are.

Forms response chart. Question title: Which technologies do you currently use outdoors on your property? . Number of responses: 45 responses.

This is about as expected. Not all the recipients of the survey are current Ayrstone customers, so not all of them have outdoor WiFi. It’s quite interesting that everyone in the AgTech industry is talking about LoRaWAN, but nobody out in the field seems to be using it. It was also interesting to see that 4 people indicated they had private cellular coverage – we’d love to talk to you more about that.

Forms response chart. Question title: What do you use your existing outdoor wireless networks on your property for? . Number of responses: 43 responses.

This is about what we expected. Should we have included other options? Past surveys and conversations have reflected that these are the major current uses, and we expect that Robotics and farm automation will become a major driver for wireless networks on the farm.

Forms response chart. Question title: What is the highest priority in adding outdoor wireless coverage on your farm?. Number of responses: 45 responses.

Now, this we found interesting. We have known for a while that security continues to be a concern for farmers, but this is fairly overwhelming. We are always on the lookout for good security devices that are suitable for the rural environment, and we’re continuously disappointed at how few good options there are. We’re going to really look harder in the coming months and see if we can’t find (or even build) better security products for our customers.

Finally, we just wanted to give everyone a chance to tell us whatever they have on their minds that we didn’t ask. Sometimes this leads to interesting insights:

Is there anything else you’d like to tell us about Wireless Farm Networking? 3 responses

  • I’d like to expand uses but at present time I’m limited.
  • would add cameras to barn if we had expanded coverage
  • no

So, there you have it. We are very grateful to all the people who took the time to respond – I hope you agree that the responses are interesting.

We enjoyed putting this survey together and getting the responses, and Google’s survey tool make it very easy and efficient – we’re grateful to Google, and we’d like to do more surveys like this in the future.

What do you think? If you have any ideas, complaints, or comments you really want to share with us, please send them to [email protected] – we really do enjoy hearing from you! Are there products or services you’d like to see us bring to market? Should we do more surveys like this (and share the results)? Should we have done another April 1 prank? Let us know!

The Robots are Coming! The Robots are Coming!

Leave a reply
Silly robot image
One idea of an autonomous farm…

Every week there seems to be an announcement about autonomous farm equipment – John Deere acquired Blue River in 2017, and then Bear Flag Robotics last year, and now they’re, essentially, announcing Bear Flag’s products as their own. Meanwhile, Case bought Raven Industries last year, after Raven had acquired DOT Technology and SmartAg. Even smaller, specialty-crop companies are getting into this, like GUSS and Fieldin.

The case for autonomous rolling stock is obvious – if you’re not driving the tractor/sprayer/combine/whatever, you can be somewhere else doing something else valuable. And there are times you would really rather have the robot driving…

I have considered tillage to be the activity most ready for automation, so I had applauded Bear Flag’s emphasis on tillage and Deere’s decision to acquire them and offer an autonomous 8R for tillage. I’ll be interested to see how this goes… it’s coming at a time when no-till or strip-till is increasingly popular, but there’s still a lot of the world still digging up fields.

Planting and harvest are difficult, complex, and time-sensitive tasks, so I expect they will be the last to be automated, but that still leaves spraying and cultivating. GUSS out here in California is already out spraying orchards, and, again, I think Deere was smart to acquire Blue River for their vision-based weeding system. It’s not ready to be a blockbuster product this year, but I can certainly see a future where weeding (and possibly other pest control) is done by a self-driving machine. The autonomous farm won’t be a complete “rip-and-replace” operation – I expect we’ll see it come one piece at a time, slowly replacing human labor, just as it has for the last 200 years.

In truth, once you are liberated from having to drive the machine, of course, you can actually employ more machines. You can have multiple large machines, like the Deere 8R tractor or the Raven (now Case) Omnipower platform, working in different fields, or you could conceivably start replacing some of them with swarms of small, nimble machines like the prototype Fendt Xaver seeder or the Australian Swarmfarm sprayer.

However, having multiple machines in the field requires that they be able to communicate with each other and, possibly, with a central server. That communications must be both low-latency (to avoid delays and collisions) and high-bandwidth (to ensure that they can “speak freely” – at times they’ll need to communicate a lot of information). There are a lot of pundits out there telling us that “5G will solve everything” – and the technical specs tell us that could be absolutely true. That leaves only one important question: do you have 5G on your farm today?

If you’re in the 95{6d84e97b9d70a88c7827a68919bdc428927c26a1a62ff29e804188d6763d834c} or so who answer “no” to that question, you might want to consider another solution – a solution that might even be better. Meshing WiFi was originally designed to enable “Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks” or “MANETs” – exactly what these devices are using in the field. Instead of waiting for a carrier (or several – many farmers I know require two or more phones, because one carrier covers one part of the farm and a different carrier covers another) to come and plant a 5G network on your property, you can start establishing a WiFi network across your property using AyrMesh Hubs and AyrMesh Cab Hubs for your vehicles.

The advantages of using WiFi include:

  • You control the network: what gets covered and who gets to use it
  • It uses your existing Internet connection – no extra charges
  • It connects to your existing LAN – you can put servers on your network so data need not leave your farm
  • It’s standard, so it works with everything, from your laptop to cameras to low-cost soil sensors and controllers… including robots
  • It will get better with time – new versions of WiFi will bring advantages.

This is an exciting time for farming – things are going to change pretty quickly, and there will be real advantages for those who adopt new technologies. The AyrMesh network provides a “backbone” that allows you to adopt those technologies easily, and we’re eager to work with the companies that are producing these new technologies to maximize the value they bring to farmers.

The Future is Coming – Get Ready for the Robots…

Leave a reply

There is an image of farming – bucolic, peaceful, unfettered by the concerns of the technological age. It’s lovely, and many of us indulge it to some degree… but it is patently false. Agriculture is an industry moving quickly on the technology curve as markets demand more, higher-quality, and cheaper food and grains. Specialized implements, higher-horsepower machines, GPS steering, variable rate planting and spraying, and the cellphone have all had an impact on farm productivity. But that’s not all.

Waymo (Google) Self-Driving Car

Courtesy of Waymo

The Robots are coming.

Look, anybody who has sat in a tractor or combine moving through the field by itself using AutoSteer has to have thought, “Do I really need to be here?” In various cities around the U.S., we have been witness to Google vehicles (and others) happily (if sometimes slowly) wheeling themselves around town, their human handlers typing away on their laptops. If they can run sedans on public roads, they can run a tractor down a row of corn. There are a lot of questions about what the first (big) bunch of farm robots will be doing, but the Japanese have been using almost completely autonomous mini-tractors for rice transplanting for years. There are a lot of people and companies testing robots around the world for farming – big ones and little ones.

Case autonomous concept vehicle

Courtesy of CNH

We have been interested in robots on the farm because we had a vague sense they need a lot more data connectivity than is available in most places now. So I read this article with interest; to quote: “Internet access is a problem,” [Scott Shearer, professor and chair of Food, Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Ohio State University] said. “We need 10 megabits per second connection speed.” Data-gathering tools today can capture gigabytes of information that must be able to flow back to the driverless machine quickly and easily; and the machine must be able to communicate to a central location too.

In some places, cellular connectivity may be enough, but, as discussed earlier in this blog, we don’t expect cellular service to improve dramatically in rural America. And it’s going to still be expensive.

Our modest proposal: set up an AyrMesh network on your farm today for long-range WiFi. And be ready for the robots!

ClearPath robot

Courtesy of ClearPath Robotics

 

A Whole New Kind of AyrMesh Hub – the Hub2x2

7 Replies

The new AyrMesh Hub2x2

After extensive research, testing, and development, we are pleased to announce the all new AyrMesh Hub2x2.

The AyrMesh Hub2x2 is our first Hub to use MIMO to dramatically improve the upload and download speed, both between the Hub and your devices and between the meshed Hubs themselves. The Hub2x2 can deliver up to twice the data speed of the Hub2T, enabling our customers to do things like:

  • Use high-definition security cameras
  • Download manuals, diagrams, videos, etc. up to twice as fast
  • Make and Receive video calls
  • Stream HD movies – even out in the garden

MIMO is a technology that allows a WiFi access point (like the AyrMesh Hubs) to use multiple antennas that receive and transmit multiple “spatial streams” of data simultaneously. Multiple antennas also help make the signal more readily available in difficult places like in trees and around buildings.

The use of MIMO represents a new strategy for AyrMesh Hubs. Previous AyrMesh Hubs traded off bandwidth to achieve maximum range. The Hub2x2 combines outstanding bandwidth and excellent range to normal WIFI-enabled devices, with a small sacrifice in Hub-to-Hub range.

The reason for this tradeoff is that we have found that most of our customers have their Hubs within a mile of each other, and are primarily interested in ensuring good WiFi coverage with excellent speed around their home, pool, gardens, farm office, workshop, barns, chicken coops, and stables. The new Ayrmesh Hub2x2 is designed specifically for those needs while still enabling you to expand your AyrMesh network out into fields and across thousands of acres.

The Hub2x2 vs. the Hub2T

The AyrMesh Hub2x2 is a perfect Gateway Hub for almost any AyrMesh network, because it provides long range and high bandwidth. The Hub2x2 is also a great Remote Hub up to a mile away, making it an excellent product for providing high-bandwidth WiFi around a rural home, farm, or estate. By placing Hubs a mile or less apart, you can ensure a continuous “cloud” of WiFi for your devices.

For Remote Hub installations more than a mile away, we recommend using the Hub2T. Its single antenna “focuses” its signal much more for longer-range applications, which provides better bandwidth at those distances than the Hub2x2.

The only time we will recommend the Hub2T as a Gateway Hub is when a Remote Hub will be positioned over 2 miles away from the Gateway. In this case, the Hub2T will provide better bandwidth to the Remote Hub2T than the Hub2x2 would.

One other point: the Hub2T has MUCH lower power requirements than the Hub2x2, so it is more suitable for solar/wind powered installations.

The new AyrMesh Hub2x2 – a new kind of AyrMesh Hub

As always, please let us know what you think!

 

Introducing the New AyrMesh Receiver

Leave a reply

We are pleased to introduce the new model of the AyrMesh Receiver. This new model represents a significant improvement on the older model while maintaining complete compatibility with previous AyrMesh products. This product combines the proven software from our previous model AyrMesh Receiver with new, more capable hardware. The new AyrMesh Receiver is a bit larger than the old model, and offers several new features:

  • Bigger, stronger antenna for more solid links
  • Mounting tabs on the back for mounting to poles or flat surfaces
  • “Extra” external Power-over-Ethernet (PoE) port on the Receiver for connecting external PoE devices like Cameras
  • Standard 48V power injector/power supply so standard 802.3af devices can use the external PoE port

The ability to mount the Receiver on a flat surface (without additional hardware) is a feature that many users requested over the years, and the ability to add an outdoor PoE device will, we think, enable our customers to enhance security and operational awareness.

Overall, the new Receiver represents a significant improvement over the old model. While the old models will continue to work perfectly, you might want to consider replacing an older Receiver with the new Receiver if:

  • It is in a marginal location, where it is just getting enough signal to make the link – the new Receiver’s more powerful antennas can help; or
  • You want to have an external PoE device – like an outdoor PoE IP camera, connected to the Receiver.

As always, we welcome your thoughts, questions, and comments.

Introducing the New AyrMesh Hub2T

Leave a reply

AyrMesh Hub2TWe are pleased to announce the new AyrMesh® Hub2T.

The AyrMesh Hub2T is a direct replacement for the Hub2n, but with some important differences. It meshes with the Hub2n and any other AyrMesh “Hub2” products.

First off, the Hub2T is a lot bigger than the Hub2n, with a much bigger antenna and a tougher stainless steel mounting bracket. The bigger antenna improves the performance of the Hub, while the new bracket just makes the entire Hub more stable and reliable, whether it is mounted on a pole or a flat surface.

Paradoxically, the new Hub2T has a little less radio transmitting power (about half a watt vs. almost a watt for the Hub2n), but it performs better than the more powerful Hub2n. Why? That big antenna! Reducing the transmitting power allows us to use twice as powerful an antenna, and (at least to a degree) a higher-gain antenna is better than more transmitting power. Power allows the Hub to “shout” longer distances, but a higher-gain antenna enable the Hub to both “shout louder” and “listen better” – resulting in better overall performance.

The other interesting change is the addition of a “gland” on the bottom of the radio. This gland makes it a bit trickier to install the Hub, but it protects it from water splashing up from below. This addresses concerns we have heard from some livestock operators who want to put Hubs near livestock pens or in milking parlors or farrowing houses, but worry about having to spray water around the Hub. We still don’t recommend spraying water directly up at the Hub, but this Hub will better withstand inadvertent sprays of water from below.

The Hub2T also uses less power than the Hub2n, so it is better for solar-powered field installations – if you have experienced “dropouts” in winter due to low batteries on the solar system, the Hub2T will work better (although that may also be a sign you need to replace those batteries…)

Should you replace your Hub2n with a Hub2T? In most cases, no – you’re not going to see enough of a difference in performance to make it worthwhile. The only exception is where there is a danger of water splashing up from beneath the unit.

But, if you are just starting your AyrMesh network, and as you expand, the AyrMesh Hub2T will be a low-cost, no-hassle workhorse, whether it’s on a building or out in the field.

Quick Note: “5G” technology on the farm

Leave a reply

I have a Google Alert for “Wireless Farm” – I get about an article a week (and many of them are about wireless technologies for “server farms” and other odd things). But today I got a link to this article about “How 5G will impact the future of farming.” Intrigued, I clicked it to find a puff-piece about how Deere wants better wireless connectivity so that combines can “talk” to each other via “the cloud,” pointing out that it can take up to a minute with current technology for one combine to upload its data to the cloud, then the other combine to download that data and act on it. A couple of points here:

  1. “5G” mobile technology is based on “millimeter-wave” bands – over 20 GHz. (20,000 MHz.). Current LTE is based on 700 MHz. radios, and previous mobile data technologies (2G/3G) were “piggybacked” on existing 800 MHz. and 1900 MHz. radios. The range and, in particular, the ability of a signal to penetrate solid objects varies inversely with the frequency. So, to have 5G covering the areas cellular covers today requires a MUCH higher density of cellular towers than we have; to have it cover all of the rural U.S. will require thousands and thousands of new towers, a huge infrastructure investment
  2. As I have mentioned previously, the vast majority of cellular infrastructure investment is happening (and will continue to happen) within cities and towns, where the density of opportunities for subscriber revenue makes it profitable.
  3. Within the article, however, is this paragraph:

The term “5G” refers to the fifth-generation wireless broadband technology based on the 802.11ac standard. The packet of technology will bring speed and coverage improvements from 4G, with low-latency wireless up to 1GB/s.

802.11ac is WiFi, not mobile (cellular) technology. Specifically, it is the current generation of WiFI using the 5.8 GHz. (5,800 MHz.) radio band.

And here’s the point: “5G” mobile technology is not going to have an impact on farm operations in the forseeable future. But you can have multi-megabit WiFi technology on your farm TODAY – and you don’t have to wait for your friendly cellular carrier to put up a zillion towers. FURTHERMORE, since your AyrMesh system puts all the devices onto YOUR OWN Local-Area Network (LAN), everything on the system can just talk to each other – they don’t have to upload to the cloud and download from the cloud or anything like that. Your combines can “talk” to each other and your trucks, you can automate processes and enable autonomous vehicles – NOW – with an AyrMesh WiFi network.

 

The Internet of Things (IoT) on the Farm – Part 3

Leave a reply

In Part 1 and Part 2 of this series, as well as the associated posts on the ezeio and sensor networks, I have focused primarily on IoT hardware: the part you can see and touch, and that touches your farm.

Firmware

However, in many ways, software is much more important than the hardware. As I observed in Part 2, modern technology products are remarkably similar: a CPU, some memory, some storage, and some peripherals. If the peripheral is a relay, you have a device that can turn things on and off (like a remote-controlled power plug, or a WebRelay). If the peripheral is an “Analog to Digital Converter” (ADC) then the device can monitor sensors and report the values from those sensors. Some devices like the ezeio have both (and even more).

Of course, nothing happens on these devices without software. And software is involved in at least two important places: the software that is running on the devices themselves, sometimes referred to as “firmware,” and the software running on back-end computers (local or cloud servers, PCs, or even your phone or tablet) that is used to store and interpret the results from the devices.

These two pieces of software have to be able to “talk” with each other, and we’ll assume* they do so over your network, with the device connected to your AyrMesh network and the “back-end” software on some sort of cloud-based server on the Internet. Note that the “back-end” software COULD reside on a server on your property if you are using AyrMesh.

What the devices themselves do depends on both the hardware and the firmware on the device – in most cases, that firmware will collect readings from the sensors, upload that information to the back-end server, and, if appropriate, take commands from that server and take action, from turning on a light to starting a pump or a grain auger.

In most cases, that firmware is a closed system – there is no way for you to collect data off or communicate with the device directly, or to direct it to a location other than the vendor’s cloud server. It doesn’t have to be that way, but (1) it’s simpler, and (2) that gives the vendor much more control over the data.

The back-end server usually stores the data and presents it to you (either through a web page or a mobile app, or both). What data you see, how you see it, and what you can do with it depends on that back-end software. It may just present a time series of observations in the field as a graph, it may let you set up simple or complex rules (if the soil moisture is at this level or below, turn on the irrigation system), and it be able to present data in many useful ways (different graphs, superimposed on maps, etc.) and enable very complex control of your farm machinery.

The back-end server is usually a closed system, as well – most times it can only accept data from the vendor’s own devices. Sometimes it may have an “Application Program Interface” (API) that allows it to exchange data with other programs. It may also have the ability to upload data into it for tracking and presentation, or to download data from it for importation into another program. These APIs and import/export mechanisms may be very good, well-written, and well-documented, making them extremely useful. Or they may not. APIs are generally only useful for programmers – it takes code to make them work – but well-written and well-documented APIs can enable even relatively inexperienced programmers to create custom programs to do exactly what you want, and that can be extremely valuable.

On the other hand, back-end software without good APIs and/or import/export features is a “closed box” – what you get is just what you get, and there’s no way to get more or less. Understand, of course, that a closed system like this may do EXACTLY what you need, but, if your needs change, it may suddenly become useless.

Of course, there is also the issue of your data and what happens to it. The terms and conditions for the service may be very clear about what happens to your data, or they may be quite vague. Many of the data services will anonymize and sell the data that you store on their servers (the most unethical may not even anonymize it – beware!). This may concern you or not, depending on the nature of the data and how closely tied to your operation it is. For instance, it is generally valuable to share weather data – if your neighbors do so as well, you can gain a much better insight into the local weather patterns. On the other hand, you may not want to share geo-referenced harvest data – that tells too many people exactly what your land and your harvest is worth. “Fuzzing up” the geo-reference, however, might make it a lot more shareable.

When you are considering new devices to collect data and/or control machinery on the farm, these distinctions between “open” and “closed” systems, and the availability if good, usable APIs may seem abstract. Salespeople for “closed” systems will do their best to minimize the importance of these issues, but it’s absolutely critical. Openness in the device’s firmware means that the devices can be re-purposed to work with another system if you don’t like the vendor’s services, and openness in the back-end database means you can easily get your data and move it where it can be combined with other data and used (e.g. providing it to your agronomist for analysis, or storing it in a system where it can be combined with other data for decision-making).

Being smart about buying new technology for your farm can save you a lot of money in the long term, and a lot of frustration in the short term. We’ll keep an eye out for and report on interesting products that help you on the farm using open technologies.

*some devices connect directly to the network using WiFi or Ethernet, and some devices will have low-power networking (e.g. Zigbee or Google Threads) that use a “gateway” device to connect them to your network (or directly to a public network via cellular or satellite). There are even some that don’t talk to the network at all, using either Bluetooth or an embedded WiFi server to communicate directly with your phone, tablet, or laptop. And, of course, there are still devices that use some sort of flash memory and “sneakernet” (taking the flash memory off the device and walking it to a computer).

Welcome Eero and Google to the world of Mesh

Leave a reply

eerogoogle_wifiSince we started marketing the AyrMesh system five years ago, we have gotten inquiries from folks who have large houses, offices, and small hotels/motels – can AyrMesh work indoors? The answer, of course, is that it can work, but it’s not optimal for a number of reasons, and we do not recommend it. AyrMesh is designed for outdoor use, mainly in rural areas.

We have been able to recommend the fine Open-Mesh products for indoor and urban outdoor use, but some new products have recently entered the market.

Eero was the first in this space, with a very nice-looking product and very good technical specifications. Unlike Open-Mesh, they do not have any way to mount their units outdoors, and they only offer one model (available in a 1-, 2-, or 3-pack).

Then, this week, Google announced the new Google WiFi product, utilizing a very similar approach of very nice-looking indoor meshing access points for larger houses. The Google WiFi products will be available in November, but they can be pre-ordered.

open-meshOpen-Mesh uses their Cloudtrax website and apps to control their access points; we have used Open-Mesh here in the Ayrstone lab for years and found it to be excellent. It’s a fair bit more complicated than AyrMesh, but it has the more “commercial” features you might want for a business or a motel, and the more complex features are easily ignored for a home setup.

It’s worth mentioning that there have long been WiFi Repeaters (also known as “boosters” and “extenders”) that connect to your WiFi router and create a new WiFi signal, and devices like the Apple Airport routers that use “Wireless Distribution System” (WDS). Although a single repeater can work well, and three Apple Airport routers using WDS (one connected to the Internet and two “extenders”) can work, they don’t have the routing “smarts” of a real mesh network, and they can cause more problems than they solve. For a large house, a real WiFi meshing product like these will provide much better results without running Ethernet cables… of course, for the absolute best WiFi, there is no substitute for just running Ethernet and putting separate Access Points in each location you need WiFi. If you were clever enough to run Ethernet to the far reaches of your house before the drywall, all you have to do is plug in some dumb access points in the Ethernet – no need to mess with the indoor mesh.

The new Eero and Google WiFi products use apps to configure and control the network – I don’t know if there is a website option available, but I get the impression that the apps are the only way to control them. I don’t know about you, but my poor phone is “full” of apps, and I really don’t want another one.

So my own view is that these new players are not quite as good as what already exists in Open-Mesh, but, of course, your mileage may vary, Of course, they are being marketed like crazy, so you’re going to see them in the press all over the place.

What I think is important is that meshing WiFi is becoming mainstream, and, if you live in a large house, you don’t necessarily have to run Ethernet to get WiFi throughout the house.